If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
All this does is highlight your complete ignorance of politics.
Why? Why is socialism so bad?
Why?
"God" didn't send Jesus down to share "His" power out equally. Why would Christian's want to share theirs?
RK is just another blathering self indulgent materialist who worships his wealth above all (to the extent of even boasting of it in his profile) and looks down on all those at whose expense that consolidated wealth was made.
You want to speak of "undetected crime" in the other thread, lets examine the much longer running, widespread, and largely unindicted white collar and corporate crime perpetrated on a daily basis around the globe in the insatiable name of "profit".
RK had best invest in asbestos suits and fire extinguishers given his likely destination.
Ok, how about "Bliar"?
Ian.
Because no political party ever failed by overestimating the stupidity of the voting public?
Ian.
To me he'll always be Phoney Blair.
If he shook my hand I'd count my fingers afterwards.
And, the fact is, people turn to crime for a reason. If we remove the reason, people won't do it. Detterent effects won't stop those who have a reason to do it, only opportunists.
We need not only to hit the criminals, but the motivation for doing as such.
Anyway I've just realised I'll be off to the US on Thursday and will still be there on 5th May, so I've had to quickly organise a proxy vote.
Thats just as pathetic, if not worse because it doesnt work.
What is a bliar? It doesnt even read properly.
However like all terms they need to be used sparingly or else they become a meaningless mantra
Each morsel of truth is having to be prised from the Labour Lie Machine but it does seem as though Lord Goldsmith had severe reservations about the legality of the war.
He said:
1) The UN, and not the US or UK, was the appropriate body to decide whether Saddam Hussein was in "material breach" of resolutions aimed at curbing his WMD programme.
2) The UN had not authorised the use of "all necessary means" to enforce its resolutions against Saddam Hussein.
3) A second UN resolution was necessary before hositilites began.
4) Earlier UN resolutions authorising military action were no longer valid.
5) UN weapons inspector Hans Blix was reporting co-operation from Iraq.
6) The US's legal position on the validity of the war did not apply to the UK.
So once again the question has to be asked: Can you believe a word Blair says? Answer: NO.
He took this country into an illegal war in which British lives, amonmg many others, have been sacrificed on the altar of Blair's political ambition. Its a moral disgrace and an effront to democracy, decency, and humanity.
So given that Howard would have broadly done the same - will you be encouraging everyone on this baord to vote Lib Dem?
It was a second hand account of what someone saw when they read the paper in the past. Sounds a mite dodgy to me.
However I would very much like to see the legal advice, yet at the same time I can see why it might set a dodgy president in that legal advice should always be private.
The 13-page document written by Lord Goldsmith has been leaked. Someone had the decency to put it into the public domain so it could be very interesting to see how it runs - I hope it confirms once-and-for-all the lies and illegality of Blairs Iraq war.
Wow, such a serious, stick-up-the-arse response I've never seen on here before.... It's just a misspelling of his name to get the word "liar" ... appropriate given the nature of this debate and his track-record so far
Ian.