If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
ffs are you even listening ? He NEVER spoke politics in his lessons, what he did out of school I have no idea but whilst he was teaching the children he did what he was paid to do which was teach them. Again the school had no complaints about his teaching methods or standards, when are you gonna understand that ?
Anyways im outta this debate, pointless writing the same stuff......nobody is getting anywhere here.
Why one but not the other?
I would be concerned with a man sexually attracted to children being a school teacher. But I would also be concerned with a potential racist being a school teacher.
Sex crimes against children are despicable but they're not the only crimes or abuse around.
- I'd worry how the man would explain the slave trade to his class.
- I'd worry about how the man would indeed explain countless other things to the children, from immigration to race to the value of human beings to indeed racism in our society.
-I'd worry how the man would rate and treat non-white children.
Brainwashing or racist programming, however subtle it might be, is indeed a very worrying affair. Not as serious as sexual abuse naturally, but worrying all the same.
And that is why a BNP candidate is unsuitable to teach children.
:banghead:
It seems to be you not listening.
I'll state the point one more time shall I?
By standing for the BNP, this man is publicly saying that he supports and promotes racist and fascist views.
How can that be compatible with teaching kids? Some of whom might be black, asian, asylum seekers or gay?
Its a conflict of interests.
Where have I "support[ed] a member of the IRA teaching in a school who would show secterian prejudice in the classroom and may at some point have to speak to the children about the politics of Northern Ireland."?
I mean what I say - it depends on the situation. Do you want me to buy you a dictionary?
Buy a fucking dictionary if you don't know what situation means.
Oh for Christ's sake. You seem to have more petty insults than well-supported arguments.
You are just a left-wing ladymuck. This is a place for debate. If you want to hurl abuse at people, then go to Anything Goes. I, and several others, are fed up of it.
I've quite clearly stated my position and the reasons for it, several times. I ain't repeating it again.
You might need some lessons on how the quote function works though!:p
If the school hire him, so be it.
But as a teacher he REALLY should be impartial in his teaching manner. So he shouldn't purposefully mistreat black pupils.
He's racist, who cares? As long as he doesn't transfer his beliefs to his job, I see no evident problem.
I don't have a problem, hell for all I know the teachers at my kids school could be like that anyway.
So could my neighbour, brother, father, uncle etc...
Point is, this teacher has broken no laws, his teaching skills are not in question.
I look forward to you voicing you support for Liverpool Docks and News Intl for their stance against Unions now then...