If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
most in one session
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
whats the most E's somehas taken in one session , my friend took 13 going to a Faithless concert throughout the day, what is the maximum comsumption needed for permanent damage?
0
Comments
I find that after 4 or 5 they don't have much effect. You only have so much seratonin stored up and after that many I expect the majority of it's used up. Three of us once managed 48 in one night which equates to 17 each. Waste of pills really and it gives you a really bad comedown - not really the cleverest or most sensible use of pills!
btw, skive, whats ur little avatar from? i remember a music video with the little dude in it. what was it called?
My mate and her fella used to take upto about 15 each before she got pregnant.
Bla Bla Bla!
Works shit, so I'm on here.
Anyway, isnt this post one of those dick measuring contests that are somewhat discouraged on here. Its meaningless anyway because no-one knows what was in the pill you took. If you have to take more than five then either you should stop or you have crap pills, simple as that.
Just to add.. didnt have as good a night as i would have had if i had done 4 i was fucked as apposed to high, couldnt stand up in order to dance and was tripping like a fucker. Was fun, but not again-not for me!
i mean you question the quality of yer beans if you're necking over 5 in one nite..
only take 2 or 3 now tho
It taught me a lesson and thats never to treat E's with such disrespect.
But on the other hand the level of drugs education scares the shite out of me. Pills are NOT safe for anyone to use, let alone children!!!
If you just throw £1 pills down your neck like theres no tomorrow, there may well not be for you.
Yes they're not good for your health but dangerous is a bit of a strong word - it depends what you consider dangerous to be.
I think we can all be certain that horse riding or even fishing are healthier activities than taking MDMA, but there's also plenty of evidence to suggest that taking MDMA is no more riskier (as in chances of dying) than either of two other activities
....I don't know if I explained that very well
I would define MDMA as a substance that's not dangerous as such (as in it has a minimal chance of causing death), but also as a substance which will almost certainly have negative long term effects. How severe these effects are is still not clear, and they certainly depend upon how the drug has been used by each user.
Your right that it can be used relatively safely, but I personally see less and less of that type of use. I think the reduction in cost has set back safe use a long way.
And with the rise in kids doing them, well we really have very little idea about its long-term effects on a fully developed brain let alone a brain in development. Plus I really dread to think what it could do to someones personality growth if mis-used near the end of teenagehood. But of course all the teens on here will instantly dismiss me as just being alarmist because nothing bad can happen to them.
It's scary though-they seem to be the new trend with teens in Swansea, and Im talking full-on. For instance, there are some kids near me, around 13-14 years old, that get through about 40 between them each weekend. It turns out they manage this as one of them (whos just turned 14) is seeing this 17-year-old dealer. All her mates score off him and he makes sure that they get more than any of his other customers. He actually got this particular group into pills to begin with when he started seeing this girl, and now they all rely on him for their class A's.
Anyhoo, I digress...on the subject of MDMA and damage...well one or two ex-pillheads I know have mentioned 'finding it painful to think'. So, yes. 'Nuff said really :rolleyes:
Less is more.