Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

mind the gap

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
Dec
Sat. 1st 2001
International Day of Action Against GAP Stores. It is hoped to have people leafleting against exploitation of workers outside every GAP store in the world !
Further information from the "GAP SUCKS" website at http://www.gapsucks.org/


start printing those leaflets! lol
and you may want to check out the


Nov Sun. 18th 2001
National Rally Against the War in Afghanistan.
Organised CND and the Stop the War coalition. Assemble at noon in Hyde Park, London.
Further information from One-to-One cellphone 07951 235915 or from the Stop the War website.

"the yuppies networking the panic, the vomit, the panic, the vomit, god loves his children, god loves his children, yeah"

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by thenervousassistant:

    Nov Sun. 18th 2001
    National Rally Against the War in Afghanistan.
    Organised CND and the Stop the War coalition. Assemble at noon in Hyde Park, London.
    Further information from One-to-One cellphone 07951 235915 or from the Stop the War website.


    Ok, I don't mind your fill the GAP stuff. But you will not recieve a warm welcome from us if you try and promote Anti-war. You people cause more harm than good, and postively invite terrorists to prance around like they own the place.
    Why don't you go back to U75 and stay there? Instead of letting your pointless pacifist ideals from spilling out over here.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    more and more are questioning the impearlist motives of Bush and co..it's time to question with mindlessly endorsing the murders of innocent people

    you are living in a hyprocracy as worse as any previous reqime..it's no less worst because your ignorant of it.

    [This message has been edited by thenervousassistant (edited 02-11-2001).]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You are organising an international boycott of GAP cos they cut down a few trees..Well I spose if thats what you believe in then its commendable.

    In future you should probably make two different threads. Most people who read your post may well have supported the GAP thing but would have been put off by the anti-war thing. Tell us what we should do if we did stop the war and maybe you will get a little respect and people willing to listen. Until then you join the ranks of people saying what an evil war this is but putting forward zero alternatives.

    More and more people are not questioning the coalition..The papers are getting twitchy, thats all.

    Us? Ignorant of the facts? which facts? I daresay we know just as much as your enlightened self
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    ermm...mr NA, dare to explain how the war is "imperialist"?

    If there's anything more important than my ego around here, i want it caught and shot now
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    may i refer you to 'the culture of terrorism' a book detailing the America's endorsment of terrorism, because of less then "holy" motives (note: this isn't theory this is fact)

    may i refer you to 'profit over people' a book detailing America's finacial suffication of cuba, leading to deaths in droves (again this isn't fiction)

    This is once again a war about power and oil, how can you people be so hypocritical? One american life for thousands of afgan lifes?

    They didn't just 'cut down a few redwoods' they seem to openly endorse the abuse of children and adults in sweatshops, the fact i link this humanitarian effort to the 'peace-effort' is just logical.


    'an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind'-Gandhi

    'all we are saying is give peace a chance'-John Lennon

    'Love your neighbour'-the bible

    'and if nothing else i ask you this; love each other'-the bible

    'thou shalt not kill'-the bible

    'and if he smite you, turn the check and let him hit you again'-the bible
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Nervous assistant,

    Im a little confused as to what the hell youre complaing about.

    Nobody denies America has done some bad shit in the past but that bad shit doesnt justify the killing of 5000 innocent people completely distinct from those who did the bad shit. Because the British empire killed a load of Boers in the concentration camps does that mean a modern day Boer can kill your entire family in retaliation? You had about as much to do with the Boer war as those in the WTC had to do with US foreign policy.
    This is once again a war about power and oil, how can you people be so hypocritical? One american life for thousands of afgan lifes?

    Bollocks...If this were about oil then why didnt America invade Afghanistan years ago? They could have launched a war against terrorism after the embassy bombings.

    Do you actually know what hypocritical means? Please point out just how we are being so.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    history shows 'america taking over' isn't favoured and so the CIA illegaly endorsing terrorist organisations such as the contras (sadisnta) or in this case the taliban, this way there illegal actions are often played down and all can be blamed on the misguided policys of yesterday.

    'If we don't learn from history we are doomed to repeat it' seems pretty obvious..and the 80's sadisnta terror and the current cuba crises are very current.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The CIA and the US in general have never supported the Taliban regime other than providing them with cash to remove the opium fields.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    no, when fighting the soviets from invading afganistan they were smuggled supplys to fight them off. As were the contra's..

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    You are getting confused now..The Taliban didnt even exist at the time of the Soviet occupation. The US supplied the Mujahadeen forces which were made up of soldiers from all factions within Afghanistan. The people that went on to form the Taliban were probably Mujahadeen but so were the Northern Alliance guys. The Taliban are a sub-faction that has formed to fill the void left after Soviet withdrawl.

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    and you are forgetting the point, outside of your own imagination the us-government are not seen as a welcomed force, because of there history of illegal and frankly harshly immoral actions...of cource now Bush is using this to continue the 'fight against communism' in sadinsta..
    when cameras got photos of us-aid vechiles being used to supply arms to the contras it went ignored by the press..so it would be interesting to see what or who your basing your opnions on, obviously not foreign policy?

    [This message has been edited by thenervousassistant (edited 02-11-2001).]

    [This message has been edited by thenervousassistant (edited 02-11-2001).]
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I can assure you that the Afghans were enormously welcomed when the Soviets were occupting Afghanistan. You think the arabs gave a flying shit about the religious implications of the US aid while the Russian tanks were rolling over their land?

    The same goes for every questionable action they have ever taken. They ARE welcomed or else they wouldnt be aiding anyone..They are welcomed until they are no longer needed and then people get in a strop at their presence.

    I didnt see Bin Laden or any Afghans turning down the Stingers that the US sent to them in the 80s..
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    what your talking about isn't the issue really..but you managed to avoid my point regardless...

    why is this board so hostile towards an alternative ?

    God what happened to the world
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Nervous,

    Sorry but I thought I addressed your point 100%...Please tell me exactly what you want me to reply to and I will oblige.

    Nobody is hostile to alternatives, you just havent suggested anything. You come here and spout the same crap that we have heard a dozen times before and you dont even explain yourself fully.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Nervous, I'm not hostile to an alternative, I'm just waiting for you to tell me what the alternative actually is.

    You have said that the war is wrong, told us why you believe that, oh and that it is apparently all GAPs fault (?!:confused <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.thesite.org/ubb/smile.gif">, but as yet you have said what you would do instead.

    This issue has been discussed on many threads on this site and all we have ever asked for is an alternative, yet consistently the 'appeasers/peaceniks' fail to deliver.

    So, time to put up - or shut up.

    "Perhaps my best years are gone, but I wouldn't want them back. Not with the fire in me now." - Samuel Beckett

    <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/mica/parental.gif"&gt;
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    my point is other countrys are hostile towards the western worlds opressive interference ..and frankly my comments are refressing..all i can see are snide remarks about peace-protestors...the number of posts against bombing are small
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    i would ask you to read comments made before my statements on GAP to understand..as it was in reply.

    A alternative? A independant body monitoring the evidence, currently the us is using un-banned cluster bombs, they have been given a unmonitered almost godlike power over life and death; Instead of targating the purpitators of the crimes they aparently are seeking vengence for.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    the us is using un-banned cluster bombs

    Can you tell me which UN document details the banning of anti tank cluster bombs? I thought that the MPs calling for the banning of cluster bombs meant that they were currently not banned.
    Instead of targating the purpitators of the crimes they aparently are seeking vengence for.

    They are targetting the al Queda camps and the Taliban military...Who do you think is the perpetrator?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The US first began using cluster bombs in strikes on Afghanistan last week, but did not officially confirm their use until several days later.

    The US Government has faced criticism from several aid agencies regarding their use, including several mine clearing agencies.

    The UN also criticised their use after several cluster bombs landed on the village of Shaker Qala, near the city of Herat in western Afghanistan, killing nine civilians and injuring 14.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1630000/1630930.stm


    you were saying?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    maybe not nato banned..but considering 'nato's history' it is irrelivant...the fact Nato consideres America a unhumanitarian state speaks for it's self, do i really need to state these obvious facts?

    It dosent take a genius to know what cluster bombs result in...do you really need a explanation? Are we to consider them morally sound by whom? The lords? America? Guess i'll just sit tight and wait for a verdict
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    NA,

    Firstly, condemnation and criticism is one thing but a UN ban is very different. Cluster bombs are not banned by the UN as you just claimed.

    Secondly, im confused what NATO has to do with anything. We are talking about the UN arent we? NATO considers the US unhumanitarian? You are getting a little muddled here I think.
    Are we to consider them morally sound by whom?

    They are no less morally sound than any bomb. Why is a cluster bomb worse than a 2000lb bomb? Cluster bombs arent being used against villages as people like you would like to believe. They are being used against armoured columns and Taliban installations. They arent dropping cluster bombs in towns or cities. Comparing the 1-2% of bomblets that dont go off to mines is just silly. They arent buried under the ground, they are bright yellow and it takes more than a childs weight to set them off.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Nervous, like any other leftie, you are completely incapable of coming up with an alternative to the bombing. Everytime Baldog has asked you have come up with another reason why we shouldn't bomb them, all of which are a load of crap anyway.

    Why do people like you always bring the past into it? This conflict has nothing to do with that the only connection is that the Taliban and Northern Alliance have a few obsolete American weapons left over from the cold war and the invasion by the Soviet Union. The CIA has never endorsed the Taliban regime, and no country apart from Saudi-Arabia and Pakistan have acknowledged it's existence as a legitimate government.

    As for carpet bombing, tell me exactly how many civilians like to spend their days hanging around military installations and troop formations when they aren't busy? I'l tell you how many...NONE dumbass. Carpet bombing is the only effective way to destroy vast troop concentrations and armour columns, anyone should know that, but apparently you think they are being used against innocent civilians.
    I think you should come up with a better argument, as no one here is convinced that the war should be stopped, and from the sounds of it, your argument, like any other pacifists falls apart as soon as someone picks it apart.



    RULE BRITTANIA
    <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/flags/uk.gif"&gt;
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Man Of Kent:
    Nervous, I'm not hostile to an alternative, I'm just waiting for you to tell me what the alternative actually is.

    You have said that the war is wrong, told us why you believe that...

    ... but as yet you have said what you would do instead.

    So, time to put up - or shut up.


    Still waiting...

    "Perhaps my best years are gone, but I wouldn't want them back. Not with the fire in me now." - Samuel Beckett

    <IMG alt="image" SRC="http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/mica/parental.gif"&gt;
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    the fact is the bombs are killing inocent people, this is a fact perhaps blair was talking about people like you when he said to "keep brave" or whatever pesudoshit he had written for him. Maybe people like you don't watch the news? Havent u seen the casultys? IS it a conspiracy?

    Bore..enjoy the war, sleep well tonight..hell why shouldnt you, can you imagine if someone defended there own country by bombing us continusly during christmas....anywho i'll leave you to rationalize alone


    bye bye
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    why thank you nervous...once again, u've completely ignored our request for a FUCKING ALTERNATIVE!

    jesus CHRIST, we KNOW there are casualties, we KNOW what is happening in afghanistan and i suspect that we know more about the global situation than you and all ur left wing friends combined.

    give us a bloody alternative, and for fucks sake, learn to spell.

    If there's anything more important than my ego around here, i want it caught and shot now
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Turtle:
    why thank you nervous...once again, u've completely ignored our request for a FUCKING ALTERNATIVE!

    jesus CHRIST, we KNOW there are casualties, we KNOW what is happening in afghanistan and i suspect that we know more about the global situation than you and all ur left wing friends combined.

    give us a bloody alternative, and for fucks sake, learn to spell.

    Easy tiger! And you say my arguements are aggressive and disruptive to these calm boards!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Originally posted by Captain Kirk:
    Easy tiger! And you say my arguements are aggressive and disruptive to these calm boards!

    Yeah, but he has a point.

    Too all you lefties out there, why the hell is it so difficult for you to come up with new material and arguments, we can all do it, what makes you so different, oh wait I forgot, instead of going to school you lived in a squat.
Sign In or Register to comment.