If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options
Paedophilia
Former Member
Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
The paedophilia issues in this country are disgusting. If I go to pick up my broither from school the teachers and Mothers look at me funny as if i could be stealing him. When every man is suspected of being a deviant there is something wrong in this country.
0
Comments
That's why I'm not allowed in the Sex areas of these boards. That's where the creeps go.:nervous:
LOL you're not ALLOWED on the sex boards?:rolleyes: tehheehee
Yeah, sure there are weirdos on the internet, but be vigilant on the net. Not suspect every male over 14 of being a paedophile/rapist/purvert.
It was a brilliant piece of satire , and side splittingly funny.
Back in Spain is not uncommon for a stranger to socialise openly with a small kid or even grab him in their arms at a bar or in the park. I don't think anyone would dream of doing such a thing here.
Brass Eye was indeed a clever programme about the whole thing and those who were offended by it not only missed the point but proved the programme right.This website and the problems its creator had keeping it online (check the link on the left about the Obscene Publications Unit for a full report) also exposes the unhealthy atmosphere regarding child abuse in this country.
its better to be safe than sorry but why not get chatting to some of these mothers and explain who you are, then they will probably accept your role as a carer!
Yeah, I probably should but its a bit hard when 'the sisterhood' look at me like i've got a bottle of whisky in one hand and Pornographers Weekly in the other. I guess next time someone looks at me like that i'll say, 'been reading the mail again have you?'
"We want the law changed to make it illegal to murder children and bury them in woodland. We want it to be made illegal for adults to work with children." lol.
Child abuse is a subject that evokes emotion - and undoubtedly it should do - but when it is causing such mob mentality and people being so grossly misinformed they accuse any man near a child and confuse a paediatrician with a paedophile, there is a problem. The media having nothing to do with sensationalism of the issue, of course.
Did anyone see that programme on the BBC late last year? It followed men being investigated or charged. It was interesting. Some of them evoked a strange kind of sympathy - they had been accessing child porn, but some of them were completely arrogant. There was one who before his trial (he had abused children for years, including his neice) talked to the camera about female circumcision in Africa and how it was an attrocity that shouldn't be happening, but somehow he defended what he had done.
www.amazon.co.uk
Id do exactly the same, I would look out for any kid in the playground. If someone who I thought was a stranger was taking a child from the school then id intervene. I would also hope that other people would look out for my Daughter if someone they didnt know came to pick her up.
We have to look out for the younger generation, there are too many sickos on the loose just waiting to catch their prey.
Its sad that we have to be really careful, but you really dont know who is a paedophile, even very respectable people can be peadophiles.
Better be safe than sorry id say
How many paedophiles are therte that take children from school playgrounds? Give me a rough estimate across the entire country.
Let's be honest about the chances, i.e. they are slim, but some risks just aren't worth taking. Awareness is the name of the game here. Someone a little "strange" will be watched, especially if they are male. It may be nothing, it may be based on fact, but some risks just aren't worth taking - from a praent's perspective.
Out of interest, I support Boots move to an extent. There is no reason why people should want pictures of their naked child IMHO, so why take them?
Besides, who is to say that the person developing your film isn't a paedophile?
The risks are small I know, but that doesn't mean that I should ignore them.
I couldnt possibly give you any figures, but if I saw someone at school be it male or female looking just a touch out of place, or they drewn any kind of attention to themselves then yes I would check that the child actually knows the person picking them up.
How many times have we heard reports that someone in a blue car has been seen hanging around a school?
Its the way I am, maybe I do expect the worst to happen, but if a child was snatched from my daughters school and I'd seen a stranger taking them away then I wouldnt be able to sleep, Id be in a mess.
What you have to understand is I know these kids, my Daughters been to school with them since reception class. I know their Mums and some of their Dads so when something just doesent look right I do get a bit panicky, especially when children are involved.
Baby pictures in the bath are sweetness personified!!!
Little children run around naked all the time (or i certainly did!). Its natural and if your parents want to take pictures whos to stop them? Imagine if they destroyed someones only film of their baby on its first holiday or something because they'd taken pictures of it without any clothes on.
There message of the day
Global- [Logon News - May 19 2003] Welcome to *********! Where the men are men, the women are men, and the boys are FBI agents. but some of the men are really women. Enjoy!
At first I found it quite amusing
Then quite scary. :mad:
Pictures of children with their clothes on are sweetness personified too
I agree that children running around naked is natural (to an extent) but the need for pictures of them in this state aren't necessary.
Just a personal belief.
I think more men should be encouraged to be a part of this kind of daily routine....
When I have kids there is every possibility that my boyfriend will become a house 'husband' and so he will be doing this kind of thing everyday and I'd hate it if he was viewed with suspicion all the time!
a couple of years ago one of the houses went up for sale. one of the houses designated as safe with a clover outside. no one thought to remove the clover or check wether or not it was still relevant outside that particular property. a peado bought the house. he abused some local children. he went to prison and served about nine months. on release he was actualy outraged that the locals didn't want him back there! he doesn't live in the area any longer. he was persuaded to move when one of his eyeballs was removed by some seriously angry men in the area.
trouble is he now lives ...where? have his new nieghbours been told about his dangerous desires? you can bet not.
I ...YOU ...WE ...should demand to know when one of THEM ...is living amongst us.
come on ...at least one of you is going to have a problem with that last line. please explain why ...
But, surely, using that logic, 99% of all photographs taken should be deemed unnecessary, and should be burned without further ado.
Also on the nature of photgraphs, how can a picture of a naked child in a bath be deemed erotic, even for a pedo? And, even more improtantly, if its illegal to take pictures of your child playing, whyb is it not illegal for catalogue companies to show pictures of children modelling underwear and swimwear?
Pedophilia is vastly over-rated as a threat in thsi country- parents let their kids eat Big Macs and drink Coke, both of which are statistically about ten times as likely to kill you as a pedo is. Not to mention letting kids ride in cars, or on roller-coasters, or on Spanish coaches...
Quite simply: any person is entitled to the protection of the law, regardless of what crimes they have done. In the eyes of the law, they ahve served their punishment. The correctness of the punishment is not at issue here.
Ill take two examples. Firstly, a pedophile was "named and shamed" by the News of the World, except that the address was four years out of date. Instead, a house containing three young children was burned to the ground; the children were fortunate to escape. VERY fortunate. Now my risk analysis equals three nmear deaths with an outside chance of sexual abuse- erm, not very conclusive to Sarahs Law, is it?
Secondly, the daughter of mary Bell has been abused, violently attacked and spat at in the street. Why? Because her mother is deranged. Now THAT is what happens when "naming and shaming" happens- people should know, in order to protect their children, but, unfortunately, they cannot be trusted with that knowledge. Witness the man who had his eyeball removed- that action has, firstly, endgarered the life of the victim but, importantly (as the pedo can rot in hell IMHO) it ahs endangered the lives of children now that the police dont know where he is.
Naming and shaming does not work, and it has disastrous consequences for any civilised nation. I have said before, and, yes, it does sound callous, but the legal rights and privileges in a nation come before anything else. because once one right goes, its not long before were treated like the white farmers in Zimbabwe. people dont want to know to "look after their children", or, if they initially do, they look after their children by lynching people. And the trouble with lynch mobs is that they then attack fucking paediatricians.
Answer tyour question, or is someone gonna say "someone think of the children"?
People always complain about men not doing stuff like picking the kids up and yet, why should they, if they are met with suspicious stares and glances from women in the playground.
Children are abused and tortured so those pictures and videos can be taken and sold, and anyone who views or possesses such images is perpetuating the situation.
That's exactly what they said. The guy's appealing it. But they say even if it's knocked down...he'll probably still get 100. He was a school teacher!:eek:
I think the current situation is perfect- the police know where they are, and pay them plenty of visits, just to be nuisance and that. If I had a pedo living next door to me Id love to know, but it doesnt mean I should- my human instinct would be to kill him (or, indeed, her) but again thats not a good thing either.
*sigh*
But the legal practise always has to be that once youve done your time youve "paid your debt to society". Stricter penalties, without rights of parole, would be an even better idea than all this bollocks about "Sarahs Law". Especially as about 95% of all sexual abuse of children is committed by family and friends, and not by strangers.
That is ridiculous- its nearly as stupid as the situation with drugs.
Though he should do quite a bit of porridge, he shouldnt do time for third-party suffering because, going down that road, anyone wearing Nike trainers shopuld spend 20 years in jail.
the reason they always got parole was because you are finishing off the rest of your sentence on probation. that way the the authorities would know exactly where you were living and would have you in their office twice a week. remember parole is not the same as remission which is automatic. whilst on parole you can be taken back to finish off your sentence at anytime.
What annoys me is the people who seem to think there has been a drastic rise in the number of perverts and paedophiles in our country. There hasn't. The fact is that every single time a child goes missing it is plastered all over the news. What about the thousands who are found, safe and well? We don't hear about those do we?
I think we can go to far in protecting our children.
Becky said that people should eye others with suspicion if they are picking a child up from school and they seem strange etc. However, what about the children who are taken from the street, the ones we hear about on the news, the ones emotive people cry about? Surely nobody was looking out for them when they were "snatched". Who was there for them? Double standards I think.