Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨

Armed Forces: economic conscription is here

Man forced to join army due to lack of jobs

Economic conscription is something that has been going on in the US for decades (and often with the US army's full complicity, sending recruitment teams to deeply impoverished areas trying to lure unemployed young men).

Now it seems it has reached the UK.

Fair enough if someone wants to join the army as a first choice, but I find it a tad disturbing that some people now feel they have to join up to pay the bills...
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
«1

Comments

  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The army is nearly full. A glutton of people not wanting to leave due to the economic climate, along with a number of people applying, means a lot of trades dont have openings for people to start their basic training till middle of next year in some cases.

    The infantry isnt far short of being totally full, much like the army.

    Though I guess if people want to join up to pay the bills, then by all means they can and should. End of the day its a job that pays money (in some cases not enough).

    Because of the starting wage being £13,300 or so, you dont get that many people joining to purely solve crisis problems, but I understand it is happening, but it really does keep them busy, and some trades where you can be on £24k within a year of your start date. Also a lot more younger people who find it difficult to get jobs when they leave school and college, are turning more quickly than ever before to the army.

    I wouldnt day its anything to do with recruitment teams going to poor areas to recruit, they do Army Career Exhibitions literally all over the country, and have the recruiting offices all over the country, many army offices are tri service and recruit for all three services in the same building.

    I cant comment on manning numbers of RAF and RN till I do a tad more research, but yeah, the army is getting pretty full. More so because of the lack of people leaving which is keeping the numbers up, but recruiting is on the increase, from all walks of life.
  • SkiveSkive Posts: 15,283 Skive's The Limit
    Aladdin wrote: »
    Fair enough if someone wants to join the army as a first choice, but I find it a tad disturbing that some people now feel they have to join up to pay the bills...

    A lot of people have to do a job they don't like in order to pay their bills - many with conditions that will harm your health and take years off your life i.e factory night shifts.
    Weekender Offender 
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I do get annoyed by some people. I know Twisted Trinity dislikes the army and all it stands for (war), but she at least respects that Im doing a job I like, and respects me for doing it and standing by my convictions.

    The people I get annoyed by, there are those out there, dont understand and dont want a young lad to have a right to go to war and serve his country, get a campaign medal and make his mam and dad the proudest parents in the world. In a few cases that is actually why some people join up, its not a myth.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    If people want to join the army then why is it a bad thing? Whatever the reasons, they are their own.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    There are people who are unemployed and career benefits people, simply because they refuse to do jobs that they see to be beneath them. Im by no means saying that there are large numbers, but they do exist.

    So people having the conviction to do what they need to put food on the table, whatever the case, is noble.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    MrG wrote: »
    There are people who are unemployed and career benefits people, simply because they refuse to do jobs that they see to be beneath them.

    I agree.

    A few years ago (this was when I had no idea what I really wanted to do) I thought about joining the army, but am not allowed.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    While for people who go to the gym a lot, the entrace tests for the army are not that bad, but the better you do, the more impressive you are towards them.

    It does take a fair amount of mental and physical effort to get up to the basic standards required, and they are always looking for you to be better than that.

    So Id hardly say people find it easy to join the army in many cases, not that easy to get in and put that food on the plate :)
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I considered the armed forces as a career option once but I concluded i'd rather be unemployed for the rest of my life. It makes me cringe seeing those aggrieved families on tv "omg hes a hero he served his country". serving your country. lol. :no:
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    minimi38 wrote: »
    I considered the armed forces as a career option once but I concluded i'd rather be unemployed for the rest of my life. It makes me cringe seeing those aggrieved families on tv "omg hes a hero he served his country". serving your country. lol. :no:

    Well served, as being dead means they can no longer be 'serving'

    Hey, believe what you want but dont take the piss, I believe in it, I serve.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Tr4shed wrote: »
    Not to mention we should all repsect him for, in future putting his life on the line, but because he is out there doing something to get a job and not being one of the

    2.42 MILLION

    People un-employed in the UK.

    Is it just me, or does that sound you're having a dig at those of us who are unemployed? Many of us have no choice.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    MrG wrote: »
    Well served, as being dead means they can no longer be 'serving'

    Hey, believe what you want but dont take the piss, I believe in it, I serve.

    I'm not taking the piss.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Tr4shed wrote: »
    2.42 MILLION

    and the rest
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    minimi38 wrote: »
    I considered the armed forces as a career option once but I concluded i'd rather be unemployed for the rest of my life. It makes me cringe seeing those aggrieved families on tv "omg hes a hero he served his country". serving your country. lol. :no:

    Well you put it in such a nice way :P
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It's hardly news that some people join the army because they're unemployed - same as some become taxi drivers for the same reason, though I suppose the fact that it's a story illustrates the bias of the BBC nicely. It fits into the narrative that the army is made up of people who are unemployable elsewhere - unfortunately it's a complete bollocks narrative, after both serving in the army and being a civilian there are very few soldiers who I'd have described as uneployable and large number of civilians who couldn't hack soldiering (probably could have joined the RAF , they're much less fussy)

    That said most of the blokes I knew who joined weren't because they were unemployed, but because working 9-5 in a factory or a shop or building sie didn't appeal.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    It's hardly news that some people join the army because they're unemployed

    Well quite, and also I don't think it's really a tenable argument in a society with unemployment benefits and social welfare provision :confused:
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I have never understood why some people appear to view joining the army as something that's shameful, or something that indicates failure. In my view, it's quite the opposite. Joining the army is an extremely noble thing to do - the military could teach anyone a lot about the world and themselves. When you're in a war zone, for example, you have to think of other people, not just yourself. You have to show discipline, restraint and numerous other qualities. Those people who are out in war zones around the world are far braver than I ever will be.

    A lot of people probably get their perceptions of miltary life from watching shows such as Bad Lads Army which was on ITV1 a few years back. Whilst there inevitably will be men in the army trying to get back on the right track, that doesn't mean they're all people off the beaten track. A lot of people are able to get education and other opportunities from the army which they often wouldn't be able to obtain elsewhere.

    People who run down the military, who condemn it - they sicken me. Who would I consider a hero? The likes of Simon Weston, who served his country with distinction by fighting in the Falklands War - or someone like Steven Gerrard, an arrogant cunt who is paid to kick a piece of leather around a field? I know who I would call a hero.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    When the armed forces recruit graduates by paying their student loans off and giving them a bursary, nobody complains.

    When the armed forces recruit the unemployed by pointing out it's a stable job with many benefits, everybody complains.

    Typical BBC attitude though: if he's poor, he obviously doesn't know what he's doing. So much for the "impartial" BBC. At least the Grauniad has the decency to be honest about it's left-wing agenda.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The free dental care alone, pretty much same day appointments at the doctors.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    When the armed forces recruit graduates by paying their student loans off and giving them a bursary, nobody complains.

    When the armed forces recruit the unemployed by pointing out it's a stable job with many benefits, everybody complains.

    Well quite - it's a very classed-based attitude; however I think there are instances in the States where desperately poor communities were targeted, basically lied to, and their recruits then 'stop-lossed' for extended periods.

    I can't say as I've ever heard of the same thing happening over here though.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Tr4shed wrote: »
    I've already started getting fit for the Royal Marines woo. The army and other defence jobs, are hardly anything you'd go into without having a clue. And i completely agree with stargalaxy.

    Whatever times they give you to meet for any selection, make sure you can surpass them, the better you can do that when you turn up for a selection, will look very good on your part.

    What a lot of people dont understand is, that those times they give you to meet, are the minimum!

    Good luck if you go for them.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Tr4shed wrote: »
    Aye, specially as i want to be the best of the best.

    Join the Army then ;)
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    MrG wrote: »
    The people I get annoyed by, there are those out there, dont understand and dont want a young lad to have a right to go to war and serve his country, get a campaign medal and make his mam and dad the proudest parents in the world. In a few cases that is actually why some people join up, its not a myth.

    From when i spoke to you before i thought you were quite sincere in what you want to do so you got my respect. If i thought we was going to enter a war of self defence, i'd sign up personally but i decided in the past few months i'm TOO resistant for taking part in what is a war that if i was in any position to stop i would so i'm looking being a firefighter or something now :)

    I see the thing of signing up to get away from unemployment as a bad thing, i've always thought that this country has been right in maintaining a good volunteer army and i don't see economic hardship as a good reason to sign up, especially as it makes me think of people who've died for the US army, because it was about the only way to pay for university there

    Apart from soldiers who've abused their prisoners or give this country a terrible name, all others have got a lot of my respect for doing what is a very difficult job tbh however i don't get the whole hero worship thing the newspapers have got running at the moment, since there are some heroic deeds performed by soldiers, but just being a solider doesn't make you any more heroic than anyone else imo
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Tr4shed wrote: »
    Better pay in Royal Marine Commando's

    Actually you will find that the pay scales are the same, you will be on the same rate of pay as someone starting in the army for the first 32 weeks, in the army its first 26 weeks. (around £13.3k)

    Marine £16,681.00 - £28,372.00
    Corporal £27,051.00 - £32,531.00
    Sergeant £32,113.00 - £36,204.00
    Colour Sergeant £32,571.00 - £42,403.00
    Warrant Officer 2 £32,571.00 - £42,403.00
    Warrant Officer 1 £37,842.00 - £45,836.00

    Then it progresses to the above, which is the same as the army ranks, except the marine rank encompasses what would be private and Lance Corporal in the Army. Though will take you longer to rise to Corporal in the marines.

    Though some trades with the army you can have Lance Corporal within a year of first starting basic training, assuming you dont have to repeat any training. These trades I speak of are higher band as well, so around 24k per year.

    So you saying a blanket statement that Royal Marine Commando's get paid more, is a wide and sweeping statement that you have no information or figures to back yourself up.

    http://www.armedforces.co.uk/armypayscales.htm
    http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/royalmarines/careers/pay-conditions-and-benefits/
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The people I get annoyed by, there are those out there, dont understand and dont want a young lad to have a right to go to war and serve his country, get a campaign medal and make his mam and dad the proudest parents in the world. In a few cases that is actually why some people join up, its not a myth.

    The problem is that intentions and consequences aren't always the same thing. If someone joins up then happens to get sent out on an aggressive campaign (e.g: the Iraq war) I do not think it is unreasonable to oppose the mission while at the same time appreciating what is being done by those who are serving at the point of initiation of the campaign.

    But if a soldier joins up not really worried about whether the mission is right or not, just wants a medal, then I'm sorry but my sympathies aren't with him.

    You don't have a right to 'go to war' just because you want to (e.g: any old conflict will do) - if you join up just for the sake of saying you went to war and not really caring why you're fighting then I think that's despicable to be honest.

    Maybe I misunderstand what you have said.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The problem is that intentions and consequences aren't always the same thing. If someone joins up then happens to get sent out on an aggressive campaign (e.g: the Iraq war) I do not think it is unreasonable to oppose the mission while at the same time appreciating what is being done by those who are serving at the point of initiation of the campaign.

    But if a soldier joins up not really worried about whether the mission is right or not, just wants a medal, then I'm sorry but my sympathies aren't with him.

    You don't have a right to 'go to war' just because you want to (e.g: any old conflict will do) - if you join up just for the sake of saying you went to war and not really caring why you're fighting then I think that's despicable to be honest.
    Yes, quite. Perhaps the problem is not (or at least didn't used to) be as big here as it is in the States, but some people do have a rather loose idea of the concept of 'defending' or even 'serving' one's country.

    That is one major issue I have with those recruiting teams touring depressed areas of America and urging youngsters to join, painting a picture of 'going places, meeting new people (and shooting them)', and 'defending America'. It has been a very long time indeed since a US soldier has fought a war that had anything to do with defending America, its territories or its people.

    To a lesser degree that is starting to happen here as well.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The problem is that intentions and consequences aren't always the same thing. If someone joins up then happens to get sent out on an aggressive campaign (e.g: the Iraq war) I do not think it is unreasonable to oppose the mission while at the same time appreciating what is being done by those who are serving at the point of initiation of the campaign.

    But if a soldier joins up not really worried about whether the mission is right or not, just wants a medal, then I'm sorry but my sympathies aren't with him.

    You don't have a right to 'go to war' just because you want to (e.g: any old conflict will do) - if you join up just for the sake of saying you went to war and not really caring why you're fighting then I think that's despicable to be honest.

    Maybe I misunderstand what you have said.

    I'm not sure whether I'm understanding you or not, but the job of soldiers isn't to second guess the democratically elected Government, but go where they're told. It is not for those with guns to make the decisions, but the politicians elected by voters. As a soldier you're a professional dealer of violence (and a professional reciever of it) - the job at the end of the day is to go to 'any old war'. It is is for others to decide on the legality of it...

    Now you may say that there comes a time when as a professional soldier you're obligations as a human outweigh your obligations as a servant of a democratic state (for example an order to kill all the first borns*), but you have to be very careful about soldiers taking politics into their own hands because that's how democracy dies.

    * an illegal order so under the British Army you're not supposed to follow it, but I couldn't think of any particular examples.
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    As an aside my experience of the US armed forces is that they are much more middle class and upper-working class than the British, so this idea of the US army being made up thick ghetto kids being tricked into dying for oil seems to be a product of a fevered Michael Moore's brain aided and abbetted by some rather warped and innaccurate old fashioned European xenophobia.
  • SkiveSkive Posts: 15,283 Skive's The Limit
    but you have to be very careful about soldiers taking politics into their own hands because that's how democracy dies.

    + the effectiveness of the military goes to shit when the soldiers start asking questions.
    Weekender Offender 
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Depends what you mean by asking questions - try explaining to a bunch of pissed off Micks that leave is off and we're about to fuck off to Bos to stop a bunch of nutjobs killing each other and they'll give you plenty of questions. We were still effective (and would have been more so if allowed to do our job).

    What you don't allow is your personal views to effect the job and you go where your told (moaning all the way over perhaps, but you go)
  • Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Micks?

    :-/
Sign In or Register to comment.