If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Take a look around and enjoy reading the discussions. If you'd like to join in, it's really easy to register and then you'll be able to post. If you'd like to learn what this place is all about, head here.
Comments
If you are able to access this fairly recent article you may notice the fallibilities.
http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.archaeology/2007-12/msg00528.html
What I do see there are many assumptions. I am unclear as to what,if anything, you are trying to prove.
I do not think you know how courts work. (Eye) witnesses give evidence. Judgements are made on that apparently true and accurate eye witness accounts. There are strict rules on perjury which often have more serious consequences than any alleged offence.
We are back to the accuracy (or lack thereof) of carbon dating.
Well this topic has ,erm, evolved from it's origins. I pointed out early in the thread that once you agree to stick your snout in the trough and contract with the public sector you suffer the consequences, whether you are a corporate body such as a museum or a parent with the need to educate your children. If you are concerned about what YOUR children are taught perhaps declaring yourself incompetent to take control of that situation is not the way to go. That, ultimately, is a choice for the parent(s) to make.