Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

Buy a car, get a free gun

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7416120.stm

Apparently it is just a sign of how 'free' the country is.
Owner Mark Muller said: "We're just damn glad to live in a free country where you can have a gun if you want to."

I really hope I'm wrong but the morals, priorities and sense of right and wrong are so fucked up in that country it can only be a question of time before it implodes and self-destructs.
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    In most middle eastern countries ...kalashnikovs in the hallway are as common as umbrellas are here.
    But here in good old UK ...everything is banned and your ok with that.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Only in America could you do something like that.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Typical.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    If you had a government like theirs ...wouldn't you want arms?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    If Americans love gun ownership guns must be bad!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I would assume that normal checks have to be done before the person is given the gun? If so, I don't have much of a problem with it. I can't see any reasons why Americans are going to a listen to a bunch of Brits who object to them having guns anyway.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    stargalaxy wrote: »
    I would assume that normal checks have to be done before the person is given the gun? If so, I don't have much of a problem with it. I can't see any reasons why Americans are going to a listen to a bunch of Brits who object to them having guns anyway.
    I wouldn't expect them to listen either. But this is a debate forum for saddos like us to debate the facts of life and reflect on them, for all the good it's going to do any of us ;)

    Seriously though, this poses interesting questions IMO. For starters, if the car dealer in question had chosen to hand out hardcore porn DVDs instead you can just see the uproar it would have caused. The fact that devices that are specifically designed to seriously harm/kill a human being are so revered in the US is astonishing.

    Another question that comes to mind is the concept of 'freedom'. In many States having homosexual sex is illegal. In most if not all of them, under 21s are not allowed to buy alcohol. Yet many Americans will see themselves as 'freer' than Europeans because they can legally own guns. What kind of priorities do some of these people have???
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    In many States having homosexual sex is illegal.

    No longer the case.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_law#United_States
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    But here in good old UK ...everything is banned and your ok with that.

    Like what? Smoking indoors? Oh hang on, didn't we use New York as a guinea pig for that idea? Buying alcohol? Oh again, America has far stricter laws than the UK. Selling a sex toy? Yep, you guessed it, still illegal in Alabama. Drugs? Again, America puts us all to shame in infringing people's freedoms, including people that don't even live there and have no intention of going (you might want to ask the American airforce what they're doing in Colombia - I doubt you'll get an answer). Dealing with crime? Oops, America imprisons more of its own population than any other developed country. But at least members of its own population get a fair trial first. But keep the right to bear arms, because then at least the population can repeat slogans about how free their country is.

    Incidentally, I don't think that giving guns to a population automatically turns it into a murderous mob. I think when you allow the most violent developed population on earth to carry guns, then it is inevitable that you get a lot of shootings. I don't know whether taking them away makes any difference tbh, but it's interesting that even the most enthusiastic pro-gun person doesn't seem to support the idea of a private citizen owning any offensive weapon they can afford. I don't see many campaigns for the likes of Bill Gates to buy a few tanks and fighter jets, but by their definition, that's an infringement on his freedoms (not that I imagine Bill Gates would want a private army - he can probably shut down the entire US military at the push of a button :p). Ah well, it's not my country, so I guess they can do what they want. But I feel sorry for the huge number of Americans that recognise and want to change the things I've mentioned above, because they've got a hell of a task on their hands.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Other than ultra libertarian loonies such as one or two former posters here, most people would argue against the 'right' to own nukes. Yet I suspect that nobody, not even gun toting Americans, would feel they're less 'free' as a result of it.

    It really is a weird concept of freedom in my view... specially in a country where, as I'm with Stupid points out above, they endure more restrictions on more personal freedom issues than us Europeans.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Like what? Smoking indoors? Oh hang on, didn't we use New York as a guinea pig for that idea? Buying alcohol? Oh again, America has far stricter laws than the UK. Selling a sex toy? Yep, you guessed it, still illegal in Alabama. Drugs? Again, America puts us all to shame in infringing people's freedoms, including people that don't even live there and have no intention of going (you might want to ask the American airforce what they're doing in Colombia - I doubt you'll get an answer). Dealing with crime? Oops, America imprisons more of its own population than any other developed country. But at least members of its own population get a fair trial first. But keep the right to bear arms, because then at least the population can repeat slogans about how free their country is.

    Incidentally, I don't think that giving guns to a population automatically turns it into a murderous mob. I think when you allow the most violent developed population on earth to carry guns, then it is inevitable that you get a lot of shootings. I don't know whether taking them away makes any difference tbh, but it's interesting that even the most enthusiastic pro-gun person doesn't seem to support the idea of a private citizen owning any offensive weapon they can afford. I don't see many campaigns for the likes of Bill Gates to buy a few tanks and fighter jets, but by their definition, that's an infringement on his freedoms (not that I imagine Bill Gates would want a private army - he can probably shut down the entire US military at the push of a button :p). Ah well, it's not my country, so I guess they can do what they want. But I feel sorry for the huge number of Americans that recognise and want to change the things I've mentioned above, because they've got a hell of a task on their hands.
    YOu know summat stoopid ...your right.:yes:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Oh hang on, didn't we use New York as a guinea pig for that idea?

    Not really. The UK smoking ban was based much more on Ireland's - in being a total ban. In NYC - cigar bars and hookah lounges are exempt for example. With the exception of bits of California which have enacted their own ridiculous bylaws (banning smoking on beaches, in parks, outside areas, etc) the UK/Ireland probably have the strictest smoking ban in the world... it goes way beyond what there is in the rest of Europe and most of the US.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    In social and domesticc legislation you can't see the US as one place

    Illinois repealed it's sodomy laws before the UK did. Massaschusetts has civil marriage for gay couples (which the UK doesn't).
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    In social and domesticc legislation you can't see the US as one place

    Illinois repealed it's sodomy laws before the UK did. Massaschusetts has civil marriage for gay couples (which the UK doesn't).

    Well of course. Prostitution is legal in (I think) Nevada. And in the proper way too, not in the technical sense that it is in the UK. The reason for pointing out the various laws (and laws that are enforced) was merely to counter the suggestion that America is free merely because you can buy a gun.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I really find the coverage of America in the UK press to be depressing, stories like this are huge news and represent a totally distorted view of what the country is really like.

    Yes their government does a whole host of nasty things but have you seen how many people dont vote?

    Yes their gun control and general criminal justice system clearly doesnt work, but that's their curse as well as their choice.

    Virtually every American I have met has been thoughtful, kind and noticably more friendly than most Brits. In a country of 260 million there will always be stories like this, dont judge them all by the nutters.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Aladdin wrote: »
    Seriously though, this poses interesting questions IMO. For starters, if the car dealer in question had chosen to hand out hardcore porn DVDs instead you can just see the uproar it would have caused. The fact that devices that are specifically designed to seriously harm/kill a human being are so revered in the US is astonishing.

    Another question that comes to mind is the concept of 'freedom'. In many States having homosexual sex is illegal. In most if not all of them, under 21s are not allowed to buy alcohol. Yet many Americans will see themselves as 'freer' than Europeans because they can legally own guns. What kind of priorities do some of these people have???

    You're not looking at it from the point of view of an American. The hardcore pornography comparison cannot be sustained because it isn't sanctioned by their own history, whereas the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution reads:

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    They're drawing a crude but pretty fair comparison between an army that is necessary to defend the country, and its citizens' right to defend themselves also. "We can play with weapons; so can you - sound good?" The Constitution isn't child's play, the processes by which an article can be repealed are purposely complex and very difficult so that the "freedoms" enshrined in it cannot be changed by a capricious President - it's designed to resist the tyrannical influence of megalomaniacs.

    It's a divided country. If you grow up with people around you saying how afraid you should be of others, and nailing into your mind the constitutionally sanctioned idea that it is your right to bear arms against the hostile world, is that really a moral failure? If you say "We're taking your guns," you're in for a nightmare. In the current climate it could not be achieved. "You're telling me there's a few million Muslim terrorists in the world and you want to take my right to bear arms?" But it's not just those people; it's also seen as a historical (and metaphorical) statement of freedom - that they have guns, and it doesn't mean they'll all kill each other; in that respect it's about trust between the government and its citizens.
    budda wrote:
    Virtually every American I have met has been thoughtful, kind and noticably more friendly than most Brits. In a country of 260 million there will always be stories like this, dont judge them all by the nutters.
    Excellent point, well presented. But I'd argue there aren't even necessarily any 'nutters' in this story. This Mark Muller guy is a cynical businessman, trying to flog his cars by offering free weapons, and his voice is the only voice, other than the reporter's, in the article. It is not a story.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The areas of private and public enterprise appear to be blurred in this discussion.The Supreme Court have made rulings on the 2nd Amendment, where they have highlighted the distinction.

    There was a recent case (the name of which currently escapes me) where a man was prosecuted and sentenced to jail time for possessing an automatic machine gun without licence, registration and, of course, tax paid. The man concerned had actually built it from scratch by himself and intended to keep it for personal use only. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction on the grounds that he was protected by his 2nd Amendment rights.

    (The 2nd Amendment was expressly enacted by the authors as a protection against Government infringement of individual rights).

    If one enters the world of commerce, any such rights are contracted away, as one is now acting in a corporate capacity, and that field is regulated as Government sees fit.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    I really find the coverage of America in the UK press to be depressing, stories like this are huge news and represent a totally distorted view of what the country is really like.

    Yes their government does a whole host of nasty things but have you seen how many people dont vote?

    Yes their gun control and general criminal justice system clearly doesnt work, but that's their curse as well as their choice.

    Virtually every American I have met has been thoughtful, kind and noticably more friendly than most Brits. In a country of 260 million there will always be stories like this, dont judge them all by the nutters.

    Well said that man. :thumb:

    I'd choose a Yank over most Europeans any day :yes:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    BlackArab wrote: »
    Well said that man. :thumb:

    I'd choose a Yank over most Europeans any day :yes:

    Thanks.

    On an individual basis I'd agree with you, Americans are generally really nice. Its just the government and the political process there, along with long standing social problems which means the country has deep problems and massive inequality.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    I really find the coverage of America in the UK press to be depressing, stories like this are huge news and represent a totally distorted view of what the country is really like.

    Yes their government does a whole host of nasty things but have you seen how many people dont vote?

    Yes their gun control and general criminal justice system clearly doesnt work, but that's their curse as well as their choice.

    Virtually every American I have met has been thoughtful, kind and noticably more friendly than most Brits. In a country of 260 million there will always be stories like this, dont judge them all by the nutters.

    No one on this board has ever said anything so nice! I only ever read how we are *all* a bunch of retard gun toting violent uneducated self obsessed bible thumping morons on here and most things only ever happen "only in america" and it is often very offensive the stuff that is spouted off about "everybody" here. I'm not good with words and I can't think of the right ones to use but that was very intelligent, thought out and just downright nice and means alot.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    No one on this board has ever said anything so nice! I only ever read how we are *all* a bunch of retard gun toting violent uneducated self obsessed bible thumping morons on here and most things only ever happen "only in america" and it is often very offensive the stuff that is spouted off about "everybody" here. I'm not good with words and I can't think of the right ones to use but that was very intelligent, thought out and just downright nice and means alot.

    I'm sure people have writen things far nicer and more intelligent than the ramblings of my posts, but thanks anyway.

    As to the general anti-american feeling both here and in the UK generally, it can be quite common. I think its largely because its socially acceptable and because Brits havent travelled much in the US.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'm sorry, but who on this thread has made a single generalisation about American people? I've seen criticism of social policies, and criticisms of certain sections of American society. And it's worth bearing in mind that the average British person who discusses politics online will generally have a far more comprehensive view of American opinion than they will of their fellow Europeans. For example, I'm a member of a forum that has far more Americans than this one, and the amount of viewpoints and news stories posted critical of their own culture far out-does anything that appears on this website. This isn't anti-Americanism any more than the mountains of threads on here about problems with British culture are anti-British (which are pretty much always the same problems to a greater or lesser degree). In fact the only generalisation's I've seen on here is the one you just posted Budda, that you prefer people of a certain nationality over another. But come on, precisely what comments are you accusing of anti-Americanism? I'm naturally dubious of any such claim, because it's most frequently used as a way of surpressing criticism of a particular policy, rather than a genuine concern about xenophobia.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I wasnt suggesting that any of the comments in this thread were anti-american, but there certainly has been in the past a tendancy of some board members to mistake the actions of the US government for the feelings of all Americans. It is also quite acceptable to make jokes in the UK about the US - they are all fat for example.

    I havent said that I prefer Americans to Brits, personally I dont, I think the UK sense of humour is more in line with mine and I think the general cynical mind set here is more healthy too.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think the difference is the types of guns in the USA and how they are aquired. In Switzerland for example every adult is GIVEN an assault rifle!!! by the government. I've never heard of a Swiss mad man going on the rampage.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Whowhere wrote: »
    I think the difference is the types of guns in the USA and how they are aquired. In Switzerland for example every adult is GIVEN an assault rifle!!! by the government. I've never heard of a Swiss mad man going on the rampage.

    There is a very big difference in the 'society' in the two countries. It has nothing to do with the type of gun, it has to do with the social interactions.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I was just pointing out that a society where more powerful weapons are handed out by the government so that every person can form a militia to defend the country can be so different to a society where people can buy less powerful guns in order to form a militia.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Whowhere wrote: »
    I was just pointing out that a society where more powerful weapons are handed out by the government so that every person can form a militia to defend the country can be so different to a society where people can buy less powerful guns in order to form a militia.

    You're right, and it actually makes the whole issue of gun control a bit of a false sticking plaster on societies problems. America wouldnt suddenly reduce its murder rate if guns were illegal, at least not by much.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    stargalaxy wrote: »
    I would assume that normal checks have to be done before the person is given the gun? If so, I don't have much of a problem with it. I can't see any reasons why Americans are going to a listen to a bunch of Brits who object to them having guns anyway.

    normal checks ? yea like all those other "normal" gun holders that out of the blue walk into a school kill 30 students and then themselves cause their too chicken to be taken alive this is just irresponsable and being done purely for comercial gain. People are not responsable enough anymore to carry guns.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    People are not responsable enough anymore to carry guns.

    So if you were given a gun you'd kill someone? Would I?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    So if you were given a gun you'd kill someone? Would I?

    I wouldn't but then most people consider me "not normal" the idea of a free gun just to get the car sold is irresponsable, any anyone buying a car because they get the gun is probably not responsable either:-" oph hey I ust want a gun and if i get a car they give me one" hec you want a gun go and buy one proporley... its a gun for goodness sake not a free bottle of wine
Sign In or Register to comment.