Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

What should we do with all the old people?

As some of you may have seen aparently some 3/4 of a million old people arent getting proper care because councils have been getting more and strict about the care they give out.

My question is, given the number of old people we have, and the ratio of worker to old person is going down - what should we do with them all?

It seems we just cant afford to give all the care we want, so should we ration it? Or should we just take whatever assets the old people have to pay for it?

Personally I think its going to have to come down to councils and the government taking possession of their homes to pay for the rising costs, its a nasty option, but I cant think of any other way.
Beep boop. I'm a bot.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Euthanasia ?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I was under the impression that they are only allowed assets of 10-15k anyway and after that any other assets they have do go towards paying for their care, their homes will get taken away from them unless there is someone else living there etc. That is what is kind of suggested by this report anyway.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    J wrote: »
    We should all have large family homes and look after them ourselves if we love them as we should. We could also pass the home down the line as we got to our old age and this would save the need to build new homes. Somewhere large enough for 3 generations would work. An estate. Old school. I was a lord in a previous life I'm sure.

    I love my parents, I really do. But I don't think I can live with them again.

    But its a great idea in theory
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    J wrote: »
    We should all have large family homes and look after them ourselves if we love them as we should. We could also pass the home down the line as we got to our old age and this would save the need to build new homes. Somewhere large enough for 3 generations would work. An estate. Old school. I was a lord in a previous life I'm sure.

    I agree

    My grandma and grandad are unable to function and run a house by themselves now so my mum has cut work hours down and helps them. If one passed away, the other would definatly come and life with us. Would drive us all batty and up the wall but wouldn't think twice about doing it.

    Same as my mum, hate her to high heaven sometimes, but if she was in need of care, I would be straight there.

    Same goes for any member of my family, we would all care for the other before sticking them in some home.

    Obviously, not practical though!
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074812/

    Though we need to up the age...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
  • Options
    Teh_GerbilTeh_Gerbil Posts: 13,332 Born on Earth, Raised by The Mix
    TBQH, State run care homes. But it is unlikey to happen. We pay taxes our whole lives, and when we get old and infirm, and possibly a bit lost upstairs, the cunts won't look after us.

    Crap shit.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    J wrote: »
    We should all have large family homes and look after them ourselves if we love them as we should. We could also pass the home down the line as we got to our old age and this would save the need to build new homes. Somewhere large enough for 3 generations would work. An estate. Old school. I was a lord in a previous life I'm sure.

    Excellent idea, except I think we've come to treasure the idea of independence too much unfortunately. I think this occurs on the continent to some extent, though I can't confirm that.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074812/

    Though we need to up the age...

    :eek2:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    J wrote: »
    We should all have large family homes and look after them ourselves if we love them as we should. We could also pass the home down the line as we got to our old age and this would save the need to build new homes. Somewhere large enough for 3 generations would work. An estate. Old school. I was a lord in a previous life I'm sure.

    Great, except of course its totally impractical, there isnt the housing to do it and many people dont have families like this.

    We need to take old peoples money, its either that or they will soak up all the government funding for the whole country.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Send them to Australia. It's about 32 times as large as Britain, with a population of 19,855,288. (source - the 2006 census in Australia) We sent the convicts there a few hundred years back, now we'll send our old people. :p

    Seriously though, I don't know what to do about this. We need more young people, simple as that. It's only a matter of time before we have a government minister urging people to have more babies, and therefore, more sex. That, or we allow young people to come and live here.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The cheaper option is to allow lots of working age people to come here, that way we dont have to pay for midwives or teachers - but we cant have that because they will be strange and wont fit in and they will ruin the traditional British way of life (AKA a darkie).
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    The cheaper option is to allow lots of working age people to come here, that way we dont have to pay for midwives or teachers - but we cant have that because they will be strange and wont fit in and they will ruin the traditional British way of life (AKA a darkie).
    Oh, here we go. The usual claim from Lefties such as yourself that anyone who opposes mass immigration must be some kind of racist.

    I personally have nothing against immigrants coming to the country - but there simply isn't room for everyone. We're already the most densely populated country in Europe as it is. These immigrants would need houses, hospitals, schools and the like. These will take time to build. It would be worth the money in the long run, but it'll still take a while to make them. If the resources are there which allow more people to live here, fine - bring more in.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    We really arent that full up though, our population density isnt that high, its just people all want to live in the SE.

    And this has nothing to do with right or left, just my feeling that the average Brit doesnt like 'those people from over there'. You only have to look at the way Multiculturalism is discussed to prove that.

    And I wouldnt consider myself a Leftie, whatever you think that might mean, I'm more of a liberal (as in the kind of person who wouldnt allow torture).
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    And this has nothing to do with right or left, just my feeling that the average Brit doesnt like 'those people from over there'. You only have to look at the way Multiculturalism is discussed to prove that.
    That's because in most of the UK, multi-culturalism doesn't exist. It's only in some inner cities that it's to be found. Most places are just multi-racial. And I've no problem at all with the second one. Why do you assume that Britain is a nation of Alf Garnetts?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    stargalaxy wrote: »
    That's because in most of the UK, multi-culturalism doesn't exist. It's only in some inner cities that it's to be found. Most places are just multi-racial. And I've no problem at all with the second one. Why do you assume that Britain is a nation of Alf Garnetts?

    Maybe because at least 75% of the press is, and virtually anyone who phones into radio shows definitely is.

    And we're all multicultural and have been for ages, its preposterous to suggest otherwise. Not only have we have numerous religions for a long time, but also we've had all sorts of immigrants pretty much since we became an island.

    And even aside from that, what the hell do we actually mean by 'culture' anyway? Shared values - well thats not true. Shared interests - thats not true either. Shared history - that doesnt apply.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    Maybe because at least 75% of the press is, and virtually anyone who phones into radio shows definitely is.
    So, you assume that the morons who call in on radio shows are representative of Britain? That's like me assuming that the morons who appear on the Jeremy Kyle Show are representative of everyone on Britain's council estates.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    stargalaxy wrote: »
    So, you assume that the morons who call in on radio shows are representative of Britain? That's like me assuming that the morons who appear on the Jeremy Kyle Show are representative of everyone on Britain's council estates.

    No, but it all goes into the broader picture doesnt it, hundreds of thousands of people buy the Mail every day. Alarming numbers of people cite immigration as they key issue in elections...etc.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    No, but it all goes into the broader picture doesnt it, hundreds of thousands of people buy the Mail every day. Alarming numbers of people cite immigration as they key issue in elections...etc.
    Millions of other people buy other newspapers each day, but I don't see you shouting from the rooftops about that. If it were up to you, every person in Britain would have to take out a subscription to The Grauniad "newspaper". As for immigration, people are worried about it. And why shouldn't they be? The Government readily admits it doesn't have a clue how many illegal immigrants are in this country - shouldn't that be a cause for major concern? Mass immigration on the scale this government allows (one a minute, apparently) is unsustainable in the long run.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The question is do papers influence people, or do people buy papers they agree with. There is as much evidence for the latter as the former.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The question is do papers influence people, or do people buy papers they agree with. There is as much evidence for the latter as the former.
    Well, I've never seen someone who reads The Independent saying "fuck the environment. I'm going to drive a fast car which goes through gas like there's no tomorrow, I'm going to have my lights on at home 24 hours a day...". :p
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    stargalaxy wrote: »
    Well, I've never seen someone who reads The Independent saying "fuck the environment. I'm going to drive a fast car which goes through gas like there's no tomorrow, I'm going to have my lights on at home 24 hours a day...". :p

    I've yet to meet anyone who reads The Independent.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    stargalaxy wrote: »
    Millions of other people buy other newspapers each day, but I don't see you shouting from the rooftops about that. If it were up to you, every person in Britain would have to take out a subscription to The Grauniad "newspaper". As for immigration, people are worried about it. And why shouldn't they be? The Government readily admits it doesn't have a clue how many illegal immigrants are in this country - shouldn't that be a cause for major concern? Mass immigration on the scale this government allows (one a minute, apparently) is unsustainable in the long run.

    Again you're making massive assumptions about me - I sometimes find you very strange SG.

    Of course they dont know how many illegal immigrants are here, surely if they could get accurate stats on them they wouldnt be here anymore. Its like trying to find out how many people use drugs - by the very nature of their position illegal immigrants dont fill in the census forms.

    It may well be that many, but then huge numbers seem to be leaving to.

    I'm sure you will dismiss this because I'm some sort of socialist (which I'm not) but I just think people are getting far too worked up about what is effectively a non issue. Granted in some areas there have been problems, and the asylum system does need to be made more effective but its not a pressing issue in most peoples lives. So when I see it being made such a fuss of I can only assume that it is because of other reasons - and you hear the old 'errosion of our british culture' line.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    Again you're making massive assumptions about me - I sometimes find you very strange SG.
    Thank you very much. I always aim to befuddle and perplex.
    I'm sure you will dismiss this because I'm some sort of socialist but I just think people are getting far too worked up about what is effectively a non-issue. Granted in some areas there have been problems, and the asylum system does need to be made more effective but its not a pressing issue in most peoples lives. So when I see it being made such a fuss of I can only assume that it is because of other reasons - and you hear the old 'errosion of our british culture' line.
    I don't think there is such a thing as British culture nowadays, truth be told - unless that "culture" is defined as getting ridicilously pissed on Friday and Saturday nights.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    stargalaxy wrote: »
    I don't think there is such a thing as British culture nowadays, truth be told - unless that "culture" is defined as getting ridicilously pissed on Friday and Saturday nights.

    There wasnt ever a uniform 'British Culture' there were certain cultural norms, which are largely still there, but to suggest that we at some mythical time all shared one culture is just rubbish.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    There wasnt ever a uniform 'British Culture' there were certain cultural norms, which are largely still there, but to suggest that we at some mythical time all shared one culture is just rubbish.
    Never did say that myself. Britain's been invaded on more than one occasion in the past, after all.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I think it is worrying how distracted people become by the number of illegal immigrants. Britain has lots of them. So what? Most old people aren't given the care they need, 1 in 5 children can't read properly when they leave school, care for disabled adults is practicaly non-existant and STI's have increased so dramaticaly in the last few years that at this rate people will be tested and treated at birth. Despite what many people think, these problems aren't the result of immigration. As for the argument about British culture, the only consistant thing about it is that it's always been mainly influenced by other cultures, to the point where cultural values are more like a fashion accessary than an actual belief. Immigration is essential if we wnat to give old people any kind of care, although most old people I know are against it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well for one thing they should raise retirement age. At least nobody should be forced to retire at a certain age. I think most people could go on working until they are 70 and some may choose to work on beyond that age.

    It may seem nice at first to just take a long holiday but after a couple of months I think you would get totally bored.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well for one thing they should raise retirement age. At least nobody should be forced to retire at a certain age. I think most people could go on working until they are 70 and some may choose to work on beyond that age.

    It may seem nice at first to just take a long holiday but after a couple of months I think you would get totally bored.

    And the maths of it are just plain daft, you work for 40 years and then expect the State to look after you for 20 after that - It can possibly be made to work.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Opium and yes i'm being quite serious.
    Opium is the ideal drug for old people who are getting realy past it difficult and expensive to look after.
    It's cheap little need for expensive industrial drugs.
Sign In or Register to comment.