Home Politics & Debate
If you need urgent support, call 999 or go to your nearest A&E. To contact our Crisis Messenger (open 24/7) text THEMIX to 85258.
Read the community guidelines before posting ✨
Options

Health Care: America versus the UK

Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
Well both health care systems are lousy. In america you cant get health insurance if you have a preexisting condition, you binge drink, or have to many tickets. In the Uk anyone can get health insurance for free, the thing is you might have to wait a few months or a few years to get an operation or a doctors visit.
«1345678

Comments

  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I know which one I'd rather. The American system is corrupted and fucked up. How many millions is it that don't actually have Health Care? Too expensive and waiting lists here are dropping all the time.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Same here. I hate the way the united states government runs things, they control health care and i cant get any health care because insurance companies are too corrupted.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    UK health care has some good principles. It's only waiting lists and giving greater choice of specialist that needs to be improved.
    Not that it's an "only" as they're both quite significant, but still...
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    yea but not that much, maybe a little. better than where i live, america.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Also, if you have the money here you can go private and get seen straight away. Maybe the US should think about nationalising the health service. Though the US are notoriously anti-taxation.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Yerascrote wrote: »
    I know which one I'd rather. The American system is corrupted and fucked up. How many millions is it that don't actually have Health Care? Too expensive and waiting lists here are dropping all the time.

    low income and jobless people are covered under medicaid, it is people who earn too much to qualify for medicaid but either earn too little for health insurance or risk not taking it out that are without health care.

    not that i think the system is better than the nhs
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'd take the wait any day :yes:
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Actually being in the States right now I'm acutely aware of how bad the health care system is here. It'd be cheaper for me to get a flight to the UK and be treated back home than it would to be treated here, even with insurance. It's one of the major things putting me off moving here.

    The UK system is far superior, even with the waiting list. You don't have to re-mortgage your house to have a heart bypass in the UK....
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    well I'd prefer uk any day, and tbh i've got an operation next week, I dont think I waited to long, i got seen 2months after reporting the problem (specialist only visits the island one every month and i missed his first) and then got told 6-9m waiting list for opp, that was 3-4months ago, sooo imo, i prefer the UK health care, tbh i've never ever had a problem with it, out of all 3 (soon to be 4) of my operations I got seen before they said I would.

    Also the maternity care we received with my son was superb, couldn't be better
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Dear Wendy wrote: »
    UK health care has some good principles. It's only waiting lists and giving greater choice of specialist that needs to be improved.
    Not that it's an "only" as they're both quite significant, but still...

    Absolutely right.

    The idea that you should have to pay for your healthcare and that the lives of your citizens should be an industry for profit is fundamentally wrong.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Absolutely right.

    The idea that you should have to pay for your healthcare and that the lives of your citizens should be an industry for profit is fundamentally wrong.

    Not nearly as wrong as the idea that personal responsibility, freedom and the independence of citizens should be junked for dependency upon the government, mind. The idea that instead of you being able to do as you wish with your money, the state should take it from you, and do what it wants with it, because nanny knows best.

    The NHS is a giant black hole, more always goes into it than comes out. Sir Derek Wanless' recent report on it says just that. He basically says about £40 billion has been thrown into it with no improvement in productivity. Though he does give a 'guarded tick' for waiting times.

    If American healthcare is nationalised all you'll get are increased taxes, waiting lists, deteriorating facilities, less research and all round general lower quality health for most people with forever increasing sums being thrown at it to try to stem the problem.

    Churchill pretty much sums it up: 'The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.'
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    The US healthcare system is vastly inefficient - admin costs per person are about $1000 - compared to Canada which is $307 per person. The US Government more per person on health than the UK Government and UK private healthcare combined (and the US Government only covers the elderly and the poor).

    (source - The Undercover Economist, Tim Harford, p123-124)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Runnymede wrote: »
    Not nearly as wrong as the idea that personal responsibility, freedom and the independence of citizens should be junked for dependency upon the government, mind. The idea that instead of you being able to do as you wish with your money, the state should take it from you, and do what it wants with it, because nanny knows best.

    The NHS is a giant black hole, more always goes into it than comes out. Sir Derek Wanless' recent report on it says just that. He basically says about £40 billion pounds has been thrown into it with no improvement in productivity. Though he does give a 'guarded tick' for waiting times.

    If American healthcare is nationalised all you'll get are increased taxes, waiting lists, deteriorating facilities, less research and all round general lower quality health for most people with forever increasing sums being thrown at it to try to stem the problem.

    Churchill pretty much sums it up: 'The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.'

    Well why don't you do us all a favour and move there, see how you'll like it then.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Runnymede wrote: »
    Not nearly as wrong as the idea that personal responsibility, freedom and the independence of citizens should be junked for dependency upon the government, mind. The idea that instead of you being able to do as you wish with your money, the state should take it from you, and do what it wants with it, because nanny knows best.

    The NHS is a giant black hole, more always goes into it than comes out. Sir Derek Wanless' recent report on it says just that. He basically says about £40 billion has been thrown into it with no improvement in productivity. Though he does give a 'guarded tick' for waiting times.

    If American healthcare is nationalised all you'll get are increased taxes, waiting lists, deteriorating facilities, less research and all round general lower quality health for most people with forever increasing sums being thrown at it to try to stem the problem.

    Churchill pretty much sums it up: 'The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.'
    Lol, I'd love to see you say that when it costs you $1000 to get a tetanus jag and some eye drops when you don't have insurance in the US, and about $300 - 500 if you do.

    The system in the US is a sham. It's insurance companies procedure to reject any insurance claim that comes in, regardless of whether it's legit. Anybody interested in this should watch Michael Moore's new movie 'Sicko' cause it's all about the health insurance system in the US.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    I'm still waiting to see that :(

    Or just ask anybody what its really like. You can have the greatest insurance and still have such horror stories. I always thought the problems everybody talks about were nothing too much till I had insurance of my own. Everybody has them. The insurance companies are a business (as are all the health care facilities) Theres the stories you'll hear from Sicko, and then the every day ones that are just as bad. An entire surgery being covered, no problem, but the necessary $500+ backbrace you have to wear for 6 months after not, or on a smaller leverl, foot surgery being covered and the $50 pair of surgery boots not. Anestesia not being covered, a young girl at work had a potentionally cancerous mass found and the several thousand dollar MRI wasn't covered. And after so long of fighting different things, or evenf ighting the same thing, it's stress, its time, its money, alot of the times people just give up and pay it, whether they were supposed to or not.

    The price of even necessary medication. Most cost over $100 for a months supply, some twice that. Birth control for $60, and that is rarely covered even under insurance. Some insurance's dont' cover prescrpitions. I once had a "generous" prescription card when my insurance didn't cover, it took $10 off each prescription, all of which were still over 100 after that generous gift.

    There are so many terrible things that everybody hears about. The cost of insurance (over 100 a month for me, I believe my parents was around 800 for a family) the difficulties of getting insurance if your job doesn't offer, the even higher cost of it if you do it alone, the cost of everything medical related, profit profit profit. The insurance companies, the pharmacies, the drug companies, the professionals, the facilities the list goes on.

    And be you lucky enough to have a job that has insurance, good insurance even, you're still going to fall through all the loopholes and the cracks that they can find. It really doesn't matter how well off you are in that respect, the horror stories continue on and on.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    How the US calls itself a God fearing nation and still lets 1000's of people die because of a lack of healthcare I dont know.

    But, having said that there is absolutely no way they could have a NHS like us it would just be far too big, a state by state one is the only way forward.

    As for the NHS itself and its general productivity, frankly the biggest problem with it is us, we are fat, drunk and violent - if we actually behaved in a slightly decent way we could spend a lot less on the NHS and get a better service.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    dmdsexgod wrote: »
    In the Uk anyone can get health insurance for free, the thing is you might have to wait a few months or a few years to get an operation or a doctors visit.

    Depends on what you need to whether or not you can get it for free.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Runnymede wrote: »
    Not nearly as wrong as the idea that personal responsibility, freedom and the independence of citizens should be junked for dependency upon the government, mind. The idea that instead of you being able to do as you wish with your money, the state should take it from you, and do what it wants with it, because nanny knows best.

    The NHS is a giant black hole, more always goes into it than comes out. Sir Derek Wanless' recent report on it says just that. He basically says about £40 billion has been thrown into it with no improvement in productivity. Though he does give a 'guarded tick' for waiting times.

    If American healthcare is nationalised all you'll get are increased taxes, waiting lists, deteriorating facilities, less research and all round general lower quality health for most people with forever increasing sums being thrown at it to try to stem the problem.

    Churchill pretty much sums it up: 'The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.'

    the americans spend more per person on health than we do in this country, despite the fact the fact millions of people there have no access to decent treatment for severe medical conditions which would suggest the american insurance system is far more of a drain in profit compared to our system where bureaucracy is the hindrance(as well as the NHS doctors you wait 6months to see, you see in a few days privately in their 'time off' and probably in the same hospital too)
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    budda wrote: »
    How the US calls itself a God fearing nation and still lets 1000's of people die because of a lack of healthcare I dont know.

    But, having said that there is absolutely no way they could have a NHS like us it would just be far too big, a state by state one is the only way forward.

    As for the NHS itself and its general productivity, frankly the biggest problem with it is us, we are fat, drunk and violent - if we actually behaved in a slightly decent way we could spend a lot less on the NHS and get a better service.

    and if the NHS actually laid out some priorities for whom it treats with what, NICE is pretty good at it normally for drugs - things like IVF should be private only imo and mroe should be spent on mental health services
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    And my physical disability that has limited me to a power wheelchair does not allow me to get insurance in america. I would move to the Uk if I could afford a plane ticket. I had a spinal fusion surgery and it cost $336,000 and I could not get insurance because I was too much of a risk. Now i have nothing cause the government repossessed it all since i couldnt afford to pay it. I can;t even get medacaid cause i make over $17,000 a year, i make $25,000 a year, below the average pay in most european countries, I'd rather pay high taxes than not be able to get healthcare. I haven't been to a doctor in over a year and had to get my meds shipped from the Uk cause they cost too much in america. In america it would cost me $2000 a month, it costs me $500 a month with them shipped from the UK. Better yet, I can barely afford the $800 a month apartment cause i only make $2000 a month. So I pay $1300 for rent and meds a month and $500 for food. I weigh 119lbs and am 5 foot 9 inches tall, thats underweight by south african standards. I only have $188 left at the end of the month, I use $11 to pay for the internet. I have less than $1000 in my bank and had $1,000,000 3 years ago.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    By the way medacaid is only $600 a month so if i made no money, I could only afford my meds and not enough food to live off of.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Instead of comparing America and the UK perhaps think about the rest of Europe. I know for sure I'd rather get sick in France or Germany than here. Britain has some of the worst cancer survival rates in Europe. Lifestyle is one factor but not the only one.. Although still public-funded for the most part things work quite differently in France and Germany - and both for the most part do it better than us.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    When I get enough money im moving the hell out of America and coming to the UK or Germany.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Or maybe to another european country, but definately not Russia, too cold.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Instead of comparing America and the UK perhaps think about the rest of Europe. I know for sure I'd rather get sick in France or Germany than here. Britain has some of the worst cancer survival rates in Europe. Lifestyle is one factor but not the only one.. Although still public-funded for the most part things work quite differently in France and Germany - and both for the most part do it better than us.

    Did you hear me? I said in america I spend most of my money to live, not very well, however, I was a millionaire now im broke cause i had a $336,00 operation and my medical equipment cost the rest of what i had.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    dmdsexgod wrote: »
    Did you hear me? I said in america I spend most of my money to live, not very well, however, I was a millionaire now im broke cause i had a $336,00 operation and my medical equipment cost the rest of what i had.

    There's no need to be so harsh about it.

    I think you'll find that if you did come over to the UK< you'd still have to pay for the medical equipment you need.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Well I could bring my medical equipment with me, I could ship it.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    True. I honestly can't believe that you'd just move to the UK just so that you get your health care for free - what would you do if you didn't like it over here?
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Sofie wrote: »
    I think you'll find that if you did come over to the UK< you'd still have to pay for the medical equipment you need.

    :yes:

    Either that of we'd bill the US embassy...

    The NHS has problems, mainly due to chronic lack of underfunding over decades. It's easy to compare it to France & Germany without recognition of the fact that neither country have years of Tory underfunding to cope with.

    Wanless is also talking out of his arse, either that or is misquoted. I am not sure which/ What actually constitutes "productivity" in the NHS anyway?

    Finally, the US system. Is great for the NHS to learn from in the sense of medical techniques and how to change a culture (something which US healthcare did very successfully in the 80s) from one of gross inefficient medical practice. However, we have nothing to learn from them in the sense of funding.
  • Options
    Former MemberFormer Member Posts: 1,876,323 The Mix Honorary Guru
    Sofie wrote: »
    True. I honestly can't believe that you'd just move to the UK just so that you get your health care for free - what would you do if you didn't like it over here?

    saying "just so you can get your health care for free" like its some petty thing, when it already has almost bankrupted him and he still has to keep paying.

    Its so easy to take what we have here for granted
Sign In or Register to comment.